ERcast: Clinical Perspectives Podcast Preview

Subscription Required

Lit Matters #1: Does Roc rock, and does Sux suck?

Cameron Berg, MD and Drew Kalnow, DO

Sign in or Subscribe to listen.
5 starson Spotify
Sign in or Subscribe to view.Sign in or Subscribe to view.

The summary below is from an episode of ERcast: Clinical Perspectives

Rapid sequence intubation success depends more on airway technique and team performance than on whether you choose rocuronium or succinylcholine. In a large secondary analysis of DEVICE and PREOXI, the two paralytics showed similar first-pass success and no clear difference in severe peri-intubation complications.

Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine in RSI

  • Comparable first-pass success: First-pass success was essentially the same with succinylcholine and rocuronium, reinforcing that paralytic choice alone is unlikely to rescue a weak intubation setup.
  • No clear complication gap: Severe complications within 2 minutes of induction were not significantly different between agents, despite numerically higher events in the rocuronium group.
  • Traditional tradeoff framing: Succinylcholine still offers a slightly faster onset, while rocuronium avoids the classic hyperkalemia and malignant hyperthermia concerns that shape bedside choice.
  • System over drug dogma: The bigger signal is consistency: a familiar RSI workflow usually matters more than paralytic tribalism, and we get into that practice angle in the episode.
  • Patient-specific exceptions: Certain patients still push the choice one way or the other, especially when potassium risk or prolonged paralysis changes the calculus, but the broad winner never really emerged.

Subscribe to ERcast: Clinical Perspectives to listen to the episode.

Faculty