ERcast: Clinical Perspectives Podcast Preview

Subscription Required

Is Prescribing for Friends and Family #worthit?

Drew Kalnow, DO, Andy Little, DO, and Matthew DeLaney, MD, FACEP, FAAEM

Sign in or Subscribe to listen.
5 starson Spotify
Sign in or Subscribe to view.Sign in or Subscribe to view.

The summary below is from an episode of ERcast: Clinical Perspectives

Prescribing for yourself, family, or friends creates real legal, ethical, and medicolegal exposure even when the clinical problem seems minor. Self-prescribing laws vary by state, controlled substances are especially fraught, and any prescription for a relative can establish a physician-patient relationship.

  • Common emergency practice: Informal prescribing is widespread: older survey data found 99% of physicians had been asked for medical advice by family, and about 83% had written a prescription for a friend or relative.
  • Physician-patient relationship: Writing a prescription for a friend or family member can create a formal physician-patient relationship, which turns a casual favor into care with the usual professional and medicolegal duties.
  • State law variability: Legality is state dependent: some states prohibit self-prescribing except emergencies, while others allow limited treatment of family members for short-term minor illness or isolated settings.
  • Controlled substance red flags: Controlled substances carry the highest scrutiny, and some states bar prescribing them to family altogether while others allow only narrow emergency or self-limited exceptions. We get into the practical boundaries in the episode.
  • Ethics versus practicality: AMA ethics guidance is cautionary rather than absolute: physicians generally should not treat themselves or family, but limited emergency, isolated, or short-term minor care may be acceptable.
  • Pharmacy legitimacy standard: Pharmacists must ensure a prescription serves a legitimate medical purpose in the usual course of professional practice, so even a legal prescription may still be declined at the counter.

Safer Approach to Informal Requests

  • Consistent personal policy: A clear, repeatable approach matters more than improvisation; deciding in advance when you will decline, defer, or provide only limited bridge care reduces boundary drift and bad exceptions.
  • Minimum documentation elements: If you do provide care, document the basics you would want in any chart: name, date of birth, allergies, medication list, a brief history and exam, and risks discussed.
  • Primary care handoff: Continuity is part of the standard: the AMA specifically advises documenting care provided and conveying relevant information to the patient’s primary care physician when possible.
  • Minor problem limitation: The defensible lane is narrow and short term; chronic disease management and ongoing prescribing for relatives create the kind of blurred judgment and follow-up gaps that drive trouble.

Subscribe to ERcast: Clinical Perspectives to listen to the episode.

References:

  1. Beigel F, Mertz M, Salloch S. A systematic review documenting reasons whether physicians should provide treatment to their family and friends. Fam Pract. 2023 Jan 3:cmac142. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36593723.
  2. La Puma J, Stocking CB, La Voie D, Darling CA. When physicians treat members of their own families. Practices in a community hospital. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 31;325(18):1290-4. PMID: 1922224.
  3. Clark AW, Kay J, Clark DC. Patterns of psychoactive drug prescriptions by house officers for nonpatients. J Med Educ. 1988 Jan;63(1):44-50. PMID: 3336044

Faculty