The Stigma Surrounding Pelvic Exams

Pelvic exams in the emergency department are invasive, historically burdened, and supported by limited evidence when used routinely across all presentations. Shared decision-making, trauma-informed care, and a clear clinical indication matter more than reflexive habit or provider avoidance.

Pelvic Exam Trust and Decision-Making

• Historical foundation of mistrust: Modern gynecology carries a documented legacy of nonconsensual experimentation and pelvic exam training under anesthesia, a history that still shapes patient apprehension and institutional distrust today.
• ED environment amplifies discomfort: Curtained rooms, time pressure, and equipment logistics make the pelvic exam uncomfortable for both patients and clinicians, especially when privacy and preparation are poor.
• Trauma-informed default stance: Assume a trauma history may be present, ask about prior exam experiences up front, and preserve patient control with clear explanations, pauses, and options for who is in the room.
• Evidence gap on routine exams: The literature does not strongly support routine pelvic exams in every ED case, and even studies suggesting omission in select patients remain limited by power and bias. We get into the practical gray zone in the episode.
• Autonomy over reflex testing: When the exam's utility is uncertain, shared decision-making should drive the plan, balancing history, symptoms, ultrasound findings, and available alternatives rather than defaulting to habit.
• Provider avoidance versus indication: Low clinician comfort and declining hands-on training can push avoidance, but the key question is whether the exam is medically unnecessary or simply personally uncomfortable to perform.

References:

1. Washington HA. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2007.
2. National Center for Health Statistics. Data Query System: Hospital Emergency Department Visit. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed July 27, 2025. https://nchsdata.cdc.gov/DQS/?topic=hospital-emergency-department-visit  
3. American Journal of Managed Care. US women face worst health access, outcomes among high-income nations. Published March 2024. Accessed August 8, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/us-women-face-worst-health-access-outcomes-among-high-income-nations
4. Global Research and Consulting at Berkeley. How healthcare fails half the population: an investigation of gaps in women’s healthcare. Published October 2023. Accessed August 8, 2025. https://grc.berkeley.edu/how-healthcare-fails-half-the-population-an-investigation-of-gaps-in-womens-healthcare/
5. Alcalde-Rubio L, Hernández-Aguado I, Parker LA, Bueno-Vergara E, Chilet-Rosell E. Gender disparities in clinical practice: are there any solutions? Scoping review of interventions to overcome or reduce gender bias in clinical practice. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):166. Published 2020 Sep 22.  PMID: 32962719
6. Weitz A. When medical students perform pelvic exams on unconscious patients. The New York Times. February 17, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/health/pelvic-medical-exam-unconscious.html  
7. Frain C, Brandenburg C, Purdy E, Walker G, Keijzers G. A Mixed Methods Exploration of Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Pelvic Examinations in Emergency Departments. Emerg Med Australas. 2025;37(3):e70060. PMID: 40384467
8. Aalam AA, Iftikhar N, Baskaran N, Bhat A. Exploring Gender Disparities in Emergency Department Utilization: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of the Frequency of Female Versus Male Emergency Department Visits. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e68066. Published 2024 Aug 28.  PMID: 39347320
9. Fisher S, Couperthwaite S, Yang EH, Essel NOM, Rowe BH. Utility of pelvic examination in assessing women with bleeding in early pregnancy: a multicenter Canadian emergency department study. Int J Emerg Med. 2024;17(1):110.  PMID: 39227764
10. Agarwal I, Sarma D, Burke RC, et al. Resident Attitudes Toward Performing Pelvic Examinations in the Emergency Department. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023;4(1):89-93. Published 2023 Feb 17.  PMID: 36874233
11. Basile KC, Smith SG, Kresnow M, Khatiwada S, Leemis RW. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2016/2017 Report on Sexual Violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022.  
12. Murji A, et al. Pelvic examination practice guidelines. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(10):1492–1502.  
13. McLean ME, Santiago-Rosado L. Plight of the pelvic exam. Emerg Med J. 2019;36(6):383-384. PMID: 30996029
14. van den Bosch T, et al. Reliability of bimanual pelvic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:1-6.  
15. Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. "Brave Men" and "Emotional Women": A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:6358624. Published 2018 Feb 25.  PMID: 29682130
16. Friesen P. Ethical concerns in pelvic exam training. Bioethics. 2018;32(6):360-367.  
17. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Early Pregnancy:, Hahn SA, Promes SB, Brown MD. Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department in Early Pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(2):241-250.e20. PMID: 28126120
18. Linden JA, Grimmnitz B, Hagopian L, et al. Is the Pelvic Examination Still Crucial in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Vaginal Bleeding or Abdominal Pain When an Intrauterine Pregnancy Is Identified on Ultrasonography? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(6):825-834. PMID: 28935285
19. Cooper Owens D. Medical Bondage. Univ of Georgia Press; 2017.  
20. Patterson BW, Batt RJ, Wilbanks MD, Otles E, Westergaard MC, Shah MN. Cherry Picking Patients: Examining the Interval Between Patient Rooming and Resident Self-assignment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(6):679-684.  PMID: 26874338
21. Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(16):4296-4301. PMID: 27044069
22. Gaydos CA, et al. Self-collected swabs for STI testing. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(8):513–519.  
23. Anderson BL, et al. Pelvic exam training and patient comfort. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(1):74-78.  
24. Iraola E, Menard JP, Chariot P. Experience of Pelvic Examination and Uptake of Gynecological Care Following Domestic or Sexual Violence: a Systematic Review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024;25(5):4030-4044. PMID: 39162217