ERcast: Clinical Perspectives Podcast Preview
The summary below is from an episode of ERcast: Clinical Perspectives
Neuropathic pain is a diagnosis of mechanism, not a synonym for burning or tingling. In the acute care setting, altered sensation on exam and a central-versus-peripheral differential matter more than pain adjectives, and first-line treatment is usually antidepressant-class therapy rather than gabapentin.
Diagnosing Neuropathic Pain
- Central versus peripheral framing: Separating neuropathic pain into central and peripheral causes sharpens the differential, with stroke, spinal cord injury, and multiple sclerosis on one side and diabetic or post-herpetic neuropathy on the other.
- Pain descriptors alone mislead: Words like burning, tingling, and shooting are not diagnostic; about half of patients with musculoskeletal pain use shooting or tingling language, and roughly 30% describe burning.
- Sensory exam is pivotal: Neuropathic pain should produce altered sensation over the painful area, making the bedside sensory exam more useful than symptom adjectives or screening questionnaires.
- Questionnaire limits: Specialized neuropathic pain questionnaires are only about 80% sensitive and specific, so they support but do not replace a history and focused neurologic exam. We get into the bedside distinctions in the episode.
- High-yield etiologic clues: Post-stroke pain develops in up to 15% of ischemic stroke survivors, and as many as two-thirds of patients with multiple sclerosis develop neuropathic pain, useful context when the complaint is otherwise vague.
Treatment Choices in Acute Care
- Tricyclics as first line: TCAs offer the broadest coverage for neuropathic pain, and the analgesic dose is far lower than the antidepressant dose, with nortriptyline a common starting agent.
- Duloxetine over gabapentin: Duloxetine is a strong first-line option, especially for peripheral neuropathy, while gabapentin is often prescribed beyond the evidence and generally performs less well than TCAs or serotonergic agents.
- Pregabalin for narrow syndromes: Pregabalin has better evidence than gabapentin for selected conditions such as diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia, particularly when the diagnosis is narrow rather than broad.
- Topicals for postherpetic pain: Topical lidocaine is most useful for post-herpetic neuralgia and may be non-inferior to pregabalin, whereas capsaicin can help but is painful to apply.
- Opioids for short flares: Low-dose opioids can be effective for short-term neuropathic pain flares, with addiction risk likely overstated in carefully selected patients. We cover the caveats on the show.
- Combination therapy caution: Second-line treatment often means combining first-line agents, but TCAs and SSRIs should not be paired, and tramadol remains a weak choice supported by low-quality evidence.
Subscribe to ERcast: Clinical Perspectives to listen to the episode.
References:
- Peckham AM, et al. Gabapentin use, abuse, and the US opioid epidemic: the case for reclassification as a controlled substance and the need for pharmacovigilance. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018;11:109-116. Published 2018 Aug 17. PMID: 30154674
- Wiffen PJ, et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD007938. Published 2017 Jun 9. PMID: 28597471
- Cruccu G, Truini A. A review of Neuropathic Pain: From Guidelines to Clinical Practice. Pain Ther. 2017;6(Suppl 1):35-42. PMID: 29178033
Faculty
- Matthew DeLaney, MD, FACEP, FAAEM
Dr. Matthew DeLaney is an emergency medicine physician and educator based in Birmingham, Alabama. A native of Mobile, he earned his medical degree from the University of South Alabama and completed his emergency medicine residency at Maine Medical Center.Dr. DeLaney has experience in both community and academic emergency medicine and is known for his commitment to teaching and medical education. He lives in Birmingham with his wife, Erin, who is also a physician, and their two daughters.
- Neda Frayha, MD